{"id":546,"date":"2026-02-09T15:15:02","date_gmt":"2026-02-09T14:15:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/?p=546"},"modified":"2026-02-12T15:49:00","modified_gmt":"2026-02-12T14:49:00","slug":"3-2-2026-public-hearing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/en-GB\/post\/2026\/02\/09\/3-2-2026-public-hearing\/","title":{"rendered":"3.2.2026 Public Hearing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is no conflict of objectives: wild forests will remain wild!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What happened?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the public hearing \u2018Wild Forest\/Spreehafenviertel: Taking the conflict of objectives seriously\u2019 (&#8220;Wilder Wald\/ Spreehafenviertel: Zielkonflikt erstnehmen&#8221;) on 3 February 2026, the politicians of the district assembly, who will decide on the futur of the Wild Forest, and the public were to be informed. To this end, the political parties invited experts and the audience was able to ask questions. No decisions were made there.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Who organised this?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Die Linke and Volt (opposition, want to save the forest) had requested the public hearing, unfortunately with a formal error. The Green Party and SPD (government, want to destroy the forest) then did it themselves and thus had control over the structure and moderation. They put the issue on the agenda of the main committee (faction leaders), even though the politicians responsible for this area are members of the urban planning committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Why didn&#8217;t you have any banners with you this time?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We did. But the district office banned all signs and banners and even called the police when we arrived in the foyer. And the security service checked bags to make sure no one smuggled in a banner or sign. But we handed out all our flyers!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Were there many people there and what did they ask?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It was packed, even though the district itself didn&#8217;t advertise the public hearing. The Waldretter*innen did that as a volunteer based citizens&#8217; initiative! Right at the beginning of the hearing, the entrance was closed, and latecomers weren&#8217;t able to participate. All the people who spoke up during the hearing opposed or were critical of the destruction of the forest. But not all questions were heard!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What did the experts say?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There were nine (supposed) experts present, five against the forest, three in favour of the forest and one in favour of sports facilities. NABU, BUND and a professor of social sciences made it clear that destroying the wild forest would violate species, forest and climate protection laws, would only bring disadvantages to the people in the neighbourhood, and that the figures on how much of the forest will supposedly be preserved are incorrect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And what did the others say?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The district office and IBA once again talked about how great their plans are, the SPD once again exploited people looking for housing and refugees for their outdated housing construction and urban planning policies, and the Greens went along with it. As always: port and industrial areas are supposedly untouchable and new construction absolutely necessary, the waterfront strip and the \u2018action area\u2019 (&#8220;Ma\u00dfnahmenfl\u00e4che&#8221;, 0.9 hectares of forest that are to be preserved) will be &#8220;a good compromise&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Did anything come of it?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The official statement from the Nature Conservation Working Group (&#8220;AG Naturschutz&#8221;) in 2023 is against any development. Since then, the IBA has been weighing things up, working on it\u2026 without any changes to the plan that could even remotely be considered a compromise. An honest assessment can only be made if a no to the so-called Spreehafenviertel were possible. But with the SPD and IBA, the economy always takes precedence over nature and climate protection.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And what do you think?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We&#8217;re fed up with this pseudo-participation theatre. We don&#8217;t care what you have to say, we protect the forest \u2013 radically! This clearing season still has 20 days to go, and even after that, the same applies: stop the Spreehafenviertel, keep the wild forest! WHOLE!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/files\/2026\/02\/signal-2026-02-08-17-59-17-168-1024x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-545\" srcset=\"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/files\/2026\/02\/signal-2026-02-08-17-59-17-168-1024x1024.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/files\/2026\/02\/signal-2026-02-08-17-59-17-168-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/files\/2026\/02\/signal-2026-02-08-17-59-17-168-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/files\/2026\/02\/signal-2026-02-08-17-59-17-168-768x768.jpg 768w, https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/files\/2026\/02\/signal-2026-02-08-17-59-17-168-624x624.jpg 624w, https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/files\/2026\/02\/signal-2026-02-08-17-59-17-168.jpg 1080w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Banner we held up in front of the building, it reads &#8220;We don&#8217;t care what you have to say, we protect the forest &#8211; radically!&#8221;<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is no conflict of objectives: wild forests will remain wild! What happened? At the public hearing \u2018Wild Forest\/Spreehafenviertel: Taking the conflict of objectives seriously\u2019 (&#8220;Wilder Wald\/ Spreehafenviertel: Zielkonflikt erstnehmen&#8221;) on 3 February 2026, the politicians of the district assembly, who will decide on the futur of the Wild Forest, and the public were to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21103,"featured_media":545,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_locale":"en_GB","_original_post":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/?p=543","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-general","en-GB"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21103"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=546"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":549,"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/546\/revisions\/549"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/545"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wiwableibt.noblogs.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}